Räuberische Wissenschaftsverlage – Predatory Publishing
Der Merkurstab 2024;77(1):52-53.
Artikel-ID: DMS-21743-DE
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14271/DMS-21743-DE
1 The EQUATOR Network. Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of Health Research. Verfügbar unter www.equatornetwork. org (13.04.2023).
2 Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals. 2022. Verfügbar unter www.icmje.org/recommendations (13.04.2023).
3 Committee on Publication Ethics – COPE. Promoting Integrity in Scholarly Research and its Publication. Verfügbar unter https://publicationethics.org (13.04.2023).
4 Beall J. Medical publishing triage – chronicling predatory open access publishers. Annals of Medicine & Surgery 2013;2(2):47–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2049- 0801(13)70035-9.
5 Strinzel M, Severin A, Milzow K, et al. Blacklists and whitelists to tackle predatory publishing: a cross-sectional comparison and thematic analysis. mBio 2019;10(3):e00411–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00411-19. [Crossref]
6 Committee on Publication Ethics. Discussion Document: Predatory Publishing. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2019.3.6. [Crossref]
7 Journals. Think. Check. Submit. Verfüg - bar unter https://thinkchecksubmit.org/ journals (13.04.2023).
8 (New) list of predatory journals – 2023. Verfügbar unter https://www.openacessjournal.com/blog/predatory-journals-list (13.04.2023).
9 Eckert N. Wissenschaftliche Publikationen: So erkennt man Raubjournale. Deutsches Ärzteblatt 2019;116(49):A-2316-7. Verfügbar unter https://www.aerzteblatt.de/archiv/211191/Wissenschaftliche-Publikationen- So-erkennt-man-Raubjournale (13.04.2023).
10 Godskesen T, Eriksson S, Oermann MH, et al. Predatory conferences: a systematic scoping review. BMJ Open 2022;12(11):e062425. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062425. [Crossref]
11 Pal A, Parmar A, Sharma P. Predatory awards: the new threat in the block. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine 2022;44(5):533–535. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/02537176211042181. [Crossref]
12 Soderberg CK, Errington TM, Nosek BA. Credibility of preprints: an interdisciplinary survey of researchers. Royal Society Open Science 2020;7(10):201520. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201520. [Crossref]
13 Xie B, Shen Z, Wang K. Is preprint the future of science? A thirty year journey of online preprint services. arXiv; 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2102.09066.
14 Krämer S, Werthmann PG. Peer-Review beim Merkurstab. Der Merkurstab 2018;71(6):472. Verfügbar unter www.anthromedics.org/DMS-21018-DE (13.04.2023).
15 SSRN. Verfügbar unter www.ssrn.com (13.04.2023).
