Kriterien der Nutzenbewertung der Integrativen Medizin am Beispiel der Anthroposophischen Medizin

Florian Strasser
Article-ID: DMS-21636-DE

  • Login
  • Get Access
  • Export Citation

Zur Beurteilung des Nutzens einer medizinischen Intervention, wie z. B. Behandlungen der Anthroposophischen Medizin, werden Kriterien der ausreichenden Wirksamkeit, der Zweckmäßigkeit und der Wirtschaftlichkeit angewandt. Dieser Artikel diskutiert diese Begrifflichkeiten und kommt zu dem Schluss, dass die Wissenschaftlichkeit – als Grundlage einer integren Wirksamkeitsbeurteilung und wichtige Basis alles medizinischen Schaffens – methodisch fachspezifisch festgelegt werden muss und nicht von anderen Fachgebieten extrapoliert und übertragen werden kann. Dies stellt spezifische methodische Herausforderungen an das Fachgebiet, in kritikfähiger Transparenz und wissenschaftlicher Stringenz die medizinischen Behandlungsansätze kontinuierlich zu entwickeln.

Die Kriterien der Zweckmäßigkeit und Wirtschaftlichkeit basieren auf gesellschaftlichen Werten und Normen, die implizit (und instrumentalisierend), gelegentlich explizit angewandt werden. Das Fachgebiet ist gefordert, angewandte Normen (z. B. kurzfristiges Wirtschaftlichkeitsdenken oder Wachstumsparadigma, die Bewertung von Ergebniskriterien einer Behandlung) in innovativer und integrierender Weise werte- und menschenbildbasiert zu formulieren. Wirksamkeit, Zweckmäßigkeit und Wirtschaftlichkeit der Anthroposophischen Medizin werden im Artikel exemplarisch zusammengefasst.

Criteria for the benefit assessment of integrative medicine using the example of anthroposophic medicine

In order to assess the benefit of a medical intervention, such as treatments of anthroposophic medicine, criteria of sufficient efficacy, appropriateness and costeffectiveness are applied. This article discusses these conceptualisations and concludes that scientificity – as the basis of an assessment of efficacy with integrity and an important foundation of all medical work – must be methodologically defined in a subject-specific way and cannot be extrapolated and transferred from other disciplines. This poses specific methodological challenges to the field to continuously develop medical treatment approaches in a critically transparent and scientifically rigorous manner.

The criteria of appropriateness and cost-effectiveness are based on social values and norms that are implicitly (and instrumentally), occasionally explicitly, applied. The field is challenged to formulate applied norms (e. g. short-term economic efficiency thinking or growth paradigm, the evaluation of outcome criteria of a treatment) in an innovative and integrating way based on values and concepts of the human being. Effectiveness, appropriateness and economic efficiency of anthroposophic medicine are summarised in the article as examples.

1 Gyawali B, de Vries EGE, Dafni U, et al. Biases in study design, implementation, and data analysis that distort the appraisal of clinical benefit and ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) scoring. ESMO Open 2021;6(3):100117. DOI: [Crossref]

2 Ribi K, Kalbermatten N, Eicher M, et al. Towards a novel approach guiding the decision-making process for anticancer treatment in patients with advanced cancer: framework for systemic anticancer treatment with palliative intent. ESMO Open 2022;7(3):100496. DOI: [Crossref]

3 Panic N, Leoncini E, de Belvis G, et al. Evaluation of the endorsement of the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement on the quality of published systematic review and meta-analyses. PLoS One 2013;8(12):e83138. DOI: [Crossref]

4 Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA, et al. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2004;328(7454):1490. DOI: [Crossref]

5 Gagnier JJ, Riley D, Altman DG, et al. The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline development. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2013;110(37):603–608. DOI: [Crossref]

6 Duncan E, O’Cathain A, Rousseau N, et al. Guidance for reporting intervention development studies in health research (GUIDED): an evidence-based consensus study. BMJ Open 2020;10(4):e033516. DOI: [Crossref]

7 O’Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, et al. Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med 2014;89(9):1245–51. DOI: [Crossref]

8 Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, et al. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ 1996;312(7023):71–72. DOI: [Crossref]

9 Straus SE, Glasziou P, Richardson WS, Haynes RB. Evidence-Based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM. 5th ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2018.

10 Kumaravel B, Hearn JH, Jahangiri L, et al. A systematic review and taxonomy of tools for evaluating evidence-based medicine teaching in medical education. Syst Rev 2020;9(1):91. DOI: [Crossref]

11 Simons M, Rapport F, Zu rynski Y, et al. Links between evidence-based medicine and shared decision-making in courses for doctors in training: a scoping review. BMJ Open 2022;12(4):e057335. DOI: [Crossref]

12 Jordan K, Aapro M, Kaasa S, et al. European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) position paper on supportive and palliative care. Ann Oncol 2018;29(1):36–43. DOI: [Crossref]

13 Khatib R, Lee GA, Marques-Sule E, et al. Evaluating the extent of patient-centred care in a selection of ESC guidelines. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes 2020;6(1):55–61. DOI: [Crossref]

14 Fritzen K, Stautner C, Schnell O. Patient-centred care in type 2 diabetes mellitus – Key aspects of PDM-ProValue are reflected in the 2018 ADA/EASD consensus report. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2019;158:107897. DOI: [Crossref]

15 Brunelli A, Blackmon SH, Sentürk M, et al. Patient-centred care in thoracic surgery: a holistic approach – A review of the subjects of enhanced recovery after surgery, rehabilitation, pain management and patient-reported outcome measures in thoracic surgery. J Thorac Dis 2022;14(2):546–552. DOI: [Crossref]

16 Tilburt J, Yost KJ, Lenz HJ, et al. A multicenter comparison of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) discussions in oncology care: the role of time, patient-centeredness, and practice context. Oncologist 2019;24(11):e1180–e1189. DOI: [Crossref]

17 McGettigan P, Ferner R. We need reliable evidence to guide treatment choices for the many, not the few. BMJ 2022;377:o1465. DOI: [Crossref]

18 Tricoci P, Allen JM, Kramer JM, et al. Scientific evidence underlying the ACC/AHA clinical practice guidelines. JAMA 2009;301(8):831–841. DOI: [Crossref]

19 Poonacha TK, Go RS. Level of scientific evidence underlying recommendations arising from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network clinical practice guidelines. J Clin Oncol 2011;29(2):186–191. DOI: [Crossref]

20 Jureidini J, McHenry LB. The illusion of evidence based medicine. BMJ 2022;376:o702. DOI: [Crossref]

21 Ioannidis JP. Evidence-based medicine has been hijacked: a report to David Sackett. J Clin Epidemiol 2016;73:82–86. DOI: [Crossref]

22 Gajra A, Zettler ME, Feinberg BA. Randomization versus realworld evidence. N Engl J Med 2020;383(4):e21. DOI: [Crossref]

23 Concato J, Corrigan-Curay J. Real-world evidence – Where are we now? N Engl J Med 2022;386(18):1680–1682. DOI: [Crossref]

24 Yao L, Guyatt GH, Djulbegovic B. Can we trust strong recommendations based on low quality evidence? BMJ 2021;375:n2833. DOI: [Crossref]

25 Hjermstad MJ, Aass N, Andersen S, et al. PALLiON – PALLiative care Integrated in ONcology: study protocol for a Norwegian national cluster-randomized control trial with a complex intervention of early integration of palliative care. Trials 2020;21(1):303. DOI: [Crossref]

26 Kaptchuk TJ, Hemond CC, Miller FG. Placebos in chronic pain: evidence, theory, ethics, and use in clinical practice. BMJ 2020;370:m1668. DOI: [Crossref]

27 Kienle GS, Albonico HU, Baars E, et al. Anthroposophic medicine: an integrative medical system originating in Europe. Glob Adv Health Med 2013;2(6):20–31. DOI: [Crossref]

28 Martin D. 100-year anniversary of anthroposophic medicine as an integrative medical system. Complement Med Res 2020;27(6):375–378. DOI:

29 Bartelme RR. Anthroposophic Medicine: a short monograph and narrative review – Foundations, essential characteristics, scientific basis, safety, effectiveness and misconceptions. Glob Adv Health Med 2020;9:2164956120973634. DOI: [Crossref]

30 Baars EW, Hamre HJ. Whole medical systems versus the system of conventional biomedicine: a critical, narrative review of similarities, differences, and factors that promote the integration process. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2017;2017:4904930. DOI: [Crossref]

31 Kienle GS, Ben-Arye E, Berger B, et al. Contributing to global health: development of a consensus-based whole systems research strategy for anthroposophic medicine. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2019;2019:3706143. DOI: [Crossref]

32 Baars EW, Kiene H, Kienle GS, et al. An assessment of the scientific status of anthroposophic medicine, applying criteria from the philosophy of science. Complement Ther Med 2018;40:145–150. DOI: [Crossref]

33 Koster EB, Baars EW, Delnoij DMJ. Patient-reported quality of care in anthroposophic and integrative medicine: A scoping review. Patient Educ Couns 2020;103(2):276–285. DOI: [Crossref]

34 Baars EW, Kienle GS, Heusser P, et al. Anthroposophic medicinal products: a literature review of features, similarities and differences to conventional medicinal products, scientific and regulatory assessment. Glob Adv Health Med 2022;11:21649561211073079. DOI: [Crossref]

35 Lötzke D, Heusser P, Büssing A. A systematic literature review on the effectiveness of eurythmy therapy. J Integr Med 2015;13(4):217–230. DOI: [Crossref]

36 Kienle GS, Glockmann A, Grugel R, et al. Klinische Forschung zur Anthroposophischen Medizin – Update eines „Health Technology Assessment“- Berichts und Status Quo. [Clinical research on anthroposophic medicine: update of a health technology assessment report and status quo.] Forsch Komplementmed 2011;18(5):269–282. DOI:

37 Hamre HJ, Kiene H, Ziegler R, et al. Overview of the publications from the Anthroposophic Medicine Outcomes Study (AMOS): A whole system evaluation study. Glob Adv Health Med 2014;3(1):54–70. DOI: [Crossref]

38 Verfügbar unter: (22.02.2023).

39 Huang ZG, Feng YH, Li YH, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis: Tai Chi for preventing falls in older adults. BMJ Open 2017;7(2):e013661. DOI: [Crossref]

40 Zou L, Sasaki JE, Wei GX, et al. Effects of mind-body exercises (Tai Chi/Yoga) on heart rate variability parameters and perceived stress: a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Clin Med 2018;7(11):404. DOI: [Crossref]

41 Kamioka H, Tsutani K, Yamada M, et al. Effectiveness of music therapy: a summary of systematic reviews based on randomized controlled trials of music interventions. Patient Prefer Adherence 2014;8:727–754. DOI: [Crossref]

42 Umbrello M, Sorrenti T, Mistraletti G, et al. Music therapy reduces stress and anxiety in critically ill patients: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Minerva Anestesiol 2019;85(8):886–898. DOI:

43 Cardoso F, Senkus E, Costa A, et al. 4th ESO-ESMO International Consensus Guidelines for Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC 4). Ann Oncol 2018;29(8):1634–1657. DOI: [Crossref]

44 Hui D, Maddocks M, Johnson MJ, et al. Management of breathlessness in patients with cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines. ESMO Open 2020;5(6):e001038. DOI: [Crossref]

45 Fearon K, Strasser F, Anker SD, et al. Definition and classification of cancer cachexia: an international consensus. Lancet Oncol 2011;12(5):489–495. DOI: [Crossref]

46 Cosgrove L, Krimsky S. A comparison of DSM-IV and DSM-5 panel members’ financial associations with industry: a pernicious problem persists. PLoS Med 2012;9(3):e1001190. DOI: [Crossref]

47 Moynihan R, Lai A, Jarvis H, et al. Undisclosed financial ties between guideline writers and pharmaceutical companies: a cross-sectional study across 10 disease categories. BMJ Open 2019;9(2):e025864. DOI: [Crossref]

48 Ferrell BR, Temel JS, Temin S, et al. Integration of palliative care into standard oncology care: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol 2017;35(1):96–112. DOI: [Crossref]

49 Arends J, Strasser F, Gonella S, et al. Cancer cachexia in adult patients: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines. ESMO Open 2021;6(3):100092. DOI: [Crossref]

50 Pace A, Dirven L, Koekkoek JAF, et al. European Association for Neuro-Oncology (EANO) guidelines for palliative care in adults with glioma. Lancet Oncol 2017;18(6):e330–e340. DOI: [Crossref]

51 Siouta N, van Beek K, Preston N, et al. Towards integration of palliative care in patients with chronic heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic literature review of European guidelines and pathways. BMC Palliat Care 2016;15:18. DOI: [Crossref]

52 Stout NL, Santa Mina D, Lyons KD, et al. A systematic review of rehabilitation and exercise recommendations in oncology guidelines. CA Cancer J Clin 2021;71(2):149–175. DOI: [Crossref]

53 Stacey D, Légaré F, Lewis K, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;4(4):CD001431. DOI: [Crossref]

54 Mangin D, Stephen G, Bismah V, Risdon C. Making patient values visible in healthcare: a systematic review of tools to assess patient treatment priorities and preferences in the context of multimorbidity. BMJ Open 2016;6(6):e010903. DOI: [Crossref]

55 Harding R. Building evidence and capacity in global health palliative care. Ecancermedicalscience 2022;16:1378. DOI: [Crossref]

56 Lohman D, Cleary J, Connor S, et al. Advancing global palliative care over two decades: health system integration, access to essential medicines, and pediatrics. J Pain Symptom Manage 2022;64(1):58–69. DOI:

57 Sanchez-Rodriguez D, Marco E, Meza-Valderrama D, et al. Taking a step toward implementation of Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria in geriatric rehabilitation. Eur Geriatr Med 2020;11(3):349–352. DOI: [Crossref]

58 Mols F, Tomalin B, Pearce A, et al. Financial toxicity and employment status in cancer survivors. A systematic literature review. Support Care Cancer 2020;28(12):5693–5708. DOI: [Crossref]

59 McMahon A, McNamara J, Griffin M. A review of heart transplantation for adults with congenital heart disease. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2021;35(3):752–762. DOI: [Crossref]

60 Eiser AR. Prevention of dementia: integrative medicine and its differing epistemology. Am J Med 2020;133(4):407–408. DOI: [Crossref]

61 Hunter J, Leach M, Braun L, et al. An interpretive review of consensus statements on clinical guideline development and their application in the field of traditional and complementary medicine. BMC Complement Altern Med 2017;17(1):116. DOI: [Crossref]

62 Lyman GH, Greenlee H, Bohlke K, et al. Integrative therapies during and after breast cancer treatment: ASCO endorsement of the SIO clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol 2018;36(25):2647–2655. DOI: [Crossref]

63 Yeh GY, Horwitz R. Integrative medicine for respiratory conditions: asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Med Clin North Am 2017;101(5):925–941. DOI: [Crossref]

64 Aggarwal M, Aggarwal B, Rao J. Integrative medicine for cardiovascular disease and prevention. Med Clin North Am 2017;101(5):895–923. DOI: [Crossref]

65 Wells RE, Baute V, Wahbeh H. Complementary and integrative medicine for neurologic conditions. Med Clin North Am 2017;101(5):881–893. DOI: [Crossref]

66 Kogan M, Cheng S, Rao S, et al. Integrative medicine for geriatric and palliative care. Med Clin North Am 2017;101(5):1005–1029. DOI: [Crossref]

67 Lopez G, Mao JJ, Cohen L. Integrative oncology. Med Clin North Am 2017;101(5):977–985. DOI: [Crossref]

68 Ng JY, Jain A. Complementary and alternative medicine mention and recommendations in guidelines for anxiety: a systematic review and quality assessment. Psychiatry Res 2022;309:114388. DOI: [Crossref]

69 Wolever RQ, Caldwell KL, McKernan LC, et al. Integrative medicine strategies for changing health behaviors: support for primary care. Prim Care 2017;44(2):229–245. DOI: [Crossref]

70 Martin D, Konrad M, Adarkwah CC, et al. Reduced antibiotic use after initial treatment of acute respiratory infections with phytopharmaceuticals – a retrospective cohort study. Postgrad Med 2020;132(5):412–418. DOI: [Crossref]

71 Eras P, Simões-Wüst AP, Thijs C. Influence of alternative lifestyles on antibiotic use during pregnancy, lactation and in children. Antibiotics 2021;10(7):837. DOI: [Crossref]

72 Berger H, Hofmann Y, Wingeier B, et al. Behandlung der Streptokokkenangina ohne Antibiotika. Primary and Hospital Care 2021;21(11):360–367. Verfügbar unter Antibiotika.pdf (22.02.2023).

73 Swartz J, Aronsson B, Lindblad F, et al. Vaccination and allergic sensitization in early childhood – The ALADDIN birth cohort. EClinicalMedicine 2018;4–5:92–98. DOI: [Crossref]

74 Fagerstedt S, Hesla HM, Ekhager E, et al. Anthroposophic lifestyle is associated with a lower incidence of food allergen sensitization in early childhood. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2016;137(4):1253–1256. DOI: [Crossref]

75 Kemppainen LM, Kemppainen TT, Reippainen JA, et al. Use of complementary and alternative medicine in Europe: health-related and sociodemographic determinants. Scand J Public Health 2018;46(4):448–455. DOI: [Crossref]

76 Wode K, Henriksson R, Sharp L, et al. Cancer patients’ use of complementary and alternative medicine in Sweden: a crosssectional study. BMC Complement Altern Med 2019;19(1):62. DOI: [Crossref]

77 Wong CH, Sundberg T, Chung VC, et al. Complementary medicine use in US adults with a history of colorectal cancer: a nationally representative survey. Support Care Cancer 2021;29(1):271–278. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-020- 05494-x. [Crossref]

78 Balneaves LG, Watling CZ, Hayward EN, et al. Addressing complementary and alternative medicine use among individuals with cancer: an integrative review and clinical practice guideline. J Natl Cancer Inst 2022;114(1):25–37. DOI: [Crossref]

79 Hayward EN, Watling CZ, Balneaves LG. A pre-post evaluation of oncology healthcare providers’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices following the implementation of a complementary medicine practice guideline. Support Care Cancer 2021;29(12):7487–7495. DOI: 06318-2.

80 Hamre HJ, Glockmann A, Heckenbach K, et al. Use and safety of anthroposophic medicinal products: an analysis of 44,662 patients from the EvaMed Pharmacovigilance Network. Drugs Real World Outcomes 2017;4(4):199–213. DOI: [Crossref]

81 Jong MC, van Wietmarschen H, Glockmann A, et al. Safety of anthroposophic medicinal products: an analysis of adverse drug reactions from German pharmacovigilance databases. Drugs Real World Outcomes 2021;8(4):589–601. DOI: [Crossref]

82 Ghelman R, Akiyama IY, de Souza VT, et al. A twelve-week, four-arm, randomized, doubleblind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 prospective clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of an anthroposophic multimodal treatment on chronic pain in outpatients with postpolio syndrome. Brain Behav 2020;10(4):e01590. DOI: [Crossref]

83 von Bonin D, Klein SD, Würker J, et al. Speech-guided breathing retraining in asthma: a randomised controlled crossover trial in real-life outpatient settings. Trials 2018;19(1):333. DOI: [Crossref]

84 Quinlan TAG, Roberts AW, Frank JW, et al. Health costs of women with chronic overlapping pain conditions by opioid and complementary and integrative health use. Health Serv Res 2021;56(6):1233–1244. DOI: [Crossref]

85 Sommers E, D’Amico S, Goldstein L, et al. Integrative approaches to pediatric chronic pain in an urban safety-net hospital: cost savings, clinical benefits, and safety. J Integr Complement Med 2022;28(5):445–453. DOI: [Crossref]

86 Herman PM, Yuan AH, Cefalu MS, et al. The use of complementary and integrative health approaches for chronic musculoskeletal pain in younger US Veterans: An economic evaluation. PLoS One 2019;14(6):e0217831. DOI: [Crossref]

87 Haun JN, Paykel J, Fowler CA, et al. Preliminary evidence on the Association of Complementary and Integrative Health Care program participation and medical cost in veterans. Mil Med 2022:usab567. DOI: [Crossref]

88 Wen H, Wei X, Ge S, et al. Clinical and economic evaluation of acupuncture for opioiddependent patients receiving methadone maintenance treatment: the integrative clinical trial and evidence-based data. Front Public Health 2021;9:689753. DOI: [Crossref]

89 Hamre HJ, Witt CM, Glockmann A, et al. Health costs in anthroposophic therapy users: a two-year prospective cohort study. BMC Health Serv Res 2006;6:65. DOI: [Crossref]

90 Hamre HJ, Witt CM, Glockmann A, et al. Health costs in patients treated for depression, in patients with depressive symptoms treated for another chronic disorder, and in nondepressed patients: a two-year prospective cohort study in anthroposophic outpatient settings. Eur J Health Econ 2010;11(1):77–94. DOI: [Crossref]

91 Sundberg T, Hussain-Alkhateeb L, Falkenberg T. Usage and cost of first-line drugs for patients referred to inpatient anthroposophic integrative care or inpatient conventional care for stress-related mental disorders – a register based study. BMC Complement Altern Med 2015;14;15:354. DOI: [Crossref]

92 Fetz K, Längler A, Schwermer M, et al. Comparative analysis of resource utilization in integrative anthroposophic and all German pediatric inpatient departments. BMC Health Serv Res 2020;20(1):939. DOI: [Crossref]

93 von Schoen-Angerer T, Vagedes J, Schneider R, et al. Acceptance, satisfaction and cost of an integrative anthroposophic program for pediatric respiratory diseases in a Swiss teaching hospital: An implementation report. Complement Ther Med 2018;40:179–184. DOI: [Crossref]

94 Kessler T, Brunner L, Trittin A. Neue Screening-Methode im Rahmen der Wirtschaftlichkeitskontrolle. SÄZ 2018;99(41):1390–1391. DOI: [Crossref]

95 Delara M, Murray L, Jafari B, et al. Prevalence and factors associated with polypharmacy: a systematic review and metaanalysis. BMC Geriatr 2022;22(1):601. DOI: [Crossref]

96 Li Y, Zhang X, Yang L, et al. Association between polypharmacy and mortality in the older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2022;100:104630. DOI: [Crossref]

97 Heider D, Matschinger H, Meid AD, et al. The impact of potentially inappropriate medication on the development of health care costs and its moderation by the number of prescribed substances. Results of a retrospective matched cohort study. PLoS One 2018;13(7):e0198004. DOI: [Crossref]

98 Cámara RJ, Merz C, Wegmann B, et al. Cost-saving early diagnosis of functional pain in nonmalignant pain: a noninferiority study of diagnostic accuracy. Pain Res Treat 2016;2016:5964250. DOI: [Crossref]

99 van der Aa HPA, van Rens GHMB, Bosmans JE, et al. Economic evaluation of steppedcare versus usual care for depression and anxiety in older adults with vision impairment: randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry 2017;17(1):280. DOI: [Crossref]

Merkurstab Newsletter
Latest content with links to all articles.
Free of charge. Without obligation.
Open access to selected articles.
Sign up

J O B   M A R K E T

Arzt (m/w/d)
More details

Facharzt für Allgemeine oder Innere Medizin (m/w/d)
More details

Kinderarzt (m/w/d) 
Facharzt für Allgemeinmedizin (m/w/d) 
More details

Arzt (m/w/d)
More details